Let's Talk

Contact UsLet's Talk Solution

    Software Development, Cloud Computing, App Development

    Serverless vs Containers vs Microservices Architecture

    Serverless vs Containers vs Microservices Architecture

    Serverless computing, containers, and microservices are common in the tech industry because they represent closed-loop, pay-as-you-go, and codeless applications. To better understand these concepts, consider the differences between them.

    What is Serverless Computing?

    A type of cloud computing in which programs are hosted on an AWS Lambda platform, as opposed to on servers. This allows programmers to avoid managing machines as well as fixing or managing physical hardware.

    A model of computer software architecture called serverless computing uses a remote server to run the source code instead of relying on a specific device. It means that the server that is not connected to a specific machine may run the code without a problem for a number of individuals across the organization. This allows organizations to dynamically scale their software applications without having to worry about the underlying infrastructure.

    Serverless computing was initially introduced in 2014 by Amazon Web Services and has gradually gained popularity for its user-friendliness and flexibility. Serverless apps can be set up with ease and with little delay, making them ideal for use across multiple types of environments, such as mobile apps and web service providers.

    What are Containers?

    Containers are a type of virtualization technology in which an application is packaged within a “container” that contains everything it needs to run, such as libraries, operating-system tools, and configuration files. This feature makes it simple to package and to move applications because they can run on any operating system that is validated by container technology.

    Containers as a platform-level virtualization platform make a single system accessible for multiple processes and applications. They provide an isolated environment, thereby making the administration of various applications less complicated and allowing a more streamlined process. Containers also enable more rapid development because they eliminate the need to build and test an application using its full configuration.

    What are Microservices?

    Microservices are a modern architecture pattern for software development. They divide an application into small, self-contained, deployable pieces that can be deployed independently and run in a distributed fashion. This makes it possible to scale an application by adding more microservices instead of larger monolithic applications. Microservices are small pieces of functionality that can be deployed as separate units on a single machine or distributed across multiple machines.

    Serverless Computing vs Containers vs Microservices Architecture: Pros and Cons

    Pros of Serverless Computing

    Serverless computing can be a new means of software and application design that requires using only an application without needing to have a permanent virtual server. The result is that the software can be deployed without having to rely on a server to be on constantly.

    Serverless computing is advantageous because it can reduce costs, improve agility, and provide a frictionless platform for in-branch business software development. On top of that, serverless architectures can expand more readily than conventional architectures, because the major function of servers is eliminated.

    There are several advantages to serverless computing. It can simplify things at no cost of paying to acquire hardware as well as software that’s only required to run the app. Additionally, it need not be concerned about a single failing factor. Finally, it can allow you to scale the processes up or down without needing to bother with the performance of the software.

    Cons of Serverless Computing

    • Harder to debug and troubleshoot problems because there is no console or user interface attached to the application.
    • Slower than traditional applications due to the need for additional infrastructure in order to run them.

    Pros of Containers

    Containers have numerous advantages over their traditional server-based counterparts. They are faster to deploy, easier to expand, and less vulnerable to the failure of a program. Containers also give clients more flexibility in how applications and infrastructure come together. For instance, a container can be spun up with minimal overhead, making it great for applications designed for passengers or those that don’t need full access to the underlying operating system. Ultimately, containers make it simple to decouple an application from a particular server and move the application between servers without needing to reformat or rebuild it.

    Containers make a fine method of packaging an application and deploying it in a controlled environment. They’re great at helping with short-term deployments, as you know exactly what the environment will look like and what the software will do.

    Cons of Containers

    • They tend to be more resource-intensive than traditional applications.
    • They can be difficult to scale up or down.
    • They’re difficult to maintain and manage since you do not have full control over the underlying infrastructure.

    Pros of Microservices

    Microservices offer scalability over other frameworks since they can be broken down into smaller more digestible segments. This means that a microservice can be expanded or contracted as needed without affecting other comparable services.

    Microservices are designed to be run in a container environment, which makes them ideal for mobile and distributed apps. Microservices also make it easier for you to update your application by only having to deploy an updated microservice rather than all the old components of your software.

    Cons of Microservices

    There are a few major disadvantages of microservices:

    • Going to scale is expensive since scaling requires each unit to also scale. To make adding new services easier, each service has its own codebase and dependencies.
    • They may be difficult to configure, deploy, and maintain. Each service must be configured appropriately and separately, which can be difficult and time-consuming.
    • They are slow. Because each service runs in its own process, microservices can take a long time to respond to requests.

    How Does Serverless Computing Compare to Containers and Microservices?

    The pros and cons of each type of architecture must be considered and you need them prepared for different environments. Let’s consider a few of the most fundamental factors to consider when selecting which architecture is right for you.

    Isolated Processes: Containers provide isolation from the underlying host, which can lead to smoother operations and faster response times.

    Flexibility and Agility: Microservices architectures allow for more flexibility and agility when deploying applications, as each unit can be scaled independently.

    Pay as You Go: Serverless Computing enables organizations to pay only for what they use, rather than purchasing entire volumes of resources upfront.

    Ease of Use: Serverless computing is simple to learn and use, which makes it an appealing selection for teams with limited computer science experience.

    Which is the Best Approach for Your Application?

    Serverless platforms such as AWS Lambda allow you to completely overlook your server management as well as cloud platforms such as Google Cloud Platform. Container technologies help to package and streamline applications, while microservices make it easier for your application to grow in scale.

    To make the relevant choices for your enterprise, you should think about the information you have and/or your particular business requirements. Speak to a tech team or research firm if you need additional assistance with making a selection.

    Written by Aayush
    Writer, editor, and marketing professional with 10 years of experience, Aayush Singh is a digital nomad. With a focus on engaging digital content and SEO campaigns for SMB, and enterprise clients, he is the content creator & manager at SERP WIZARD.